The following is a guest post from George Williamson discussing his recent debates with Michael Horner and William Lane Craig (video here).
In the last week of January 2011, I debated two Christian apologists on separate occasions, one in Regina and one in Saskatoon. Both debates took place on the respective university campuses, and both were (at least in part) organized by the Campus for Christ groups on those campuses. Both occasions were well co-ordinated and organized.
In Regina, I met Michael Horner for debate, and in Saskatoon, William Lane Craig. Their arguments are substantially the same, and well-known, so I won’t spend too much time on the details, except where necessary. Horner used only three arguments (Objective Morality Argument, Kalam Cosmological Argument and Fine-tuning Argument) but to these, Craig added three more (Argument from Contingency [basically, a Cosmological Argument], Personal Experience Argument and the Resurrection of Jesus Argument). These can be easily found on the internet.
Read more »